Japan

Policy

2010-2011

Though 2010–2011 did not yield new legislation on space debris, these years were far from inactive. Instead, they marked a crucial phase of institutional alignment that set the foundation for how debris management would later be codified and enforced. During this period, Japanese authorities focused on clarifying responsibilities, consolidating policy coordination, and reframing space debris as both a technical and governance challenge.

Cabinet-Level Policy Coordination

Following the 2008 Space Basic Law, the Japanese government spent 2010–2011 consolidating its space policy authority within the Strategic Headquarters for Space Policy, located in the Cabinet Office. This centralization allowed for a more coherent national strategy and ensured that decisions on space activities were coordinated at the highest levels of government.

During this time, the government emphasized that space environmental protection was not solely a technical matter for JAXA but a strategic responsibility of the state. By framing debris mitigation and orbital safety as matters of national policy, Japan positioned itself to oversee both public and private space operations more comprehensively. This approach laid the groundwork for subsequent administrative regulations, demonstrating that orbital safety could be treated as a matter of state governance rather than just operational compliance.

Debris as a Governance Issue

In 2010–2011, government white papers and official policy submissions increasingly highlighted space debris as a strategic and regulatory concern rather than merely an engineering problem. Key points included:

Emphasizing the “safe and sustainable use of outer space” as a guiding principle for all national space activities.

Framing debris management in the context of the “long-term stability of space activities,” recognizing that orbit congestion and uncontrolled debris posed risks to national and international space operations.

This conceptual shift was significant because it justified the development of administrative oversight and potential regulation of debris mitigation practices, extending beyond voluntary or technical guidelines.

By establishing this governance framework, Japan could later hold both governmental and private actors accountable for their contributions to orbital debris.

Industry–Government Interaction

During these years, collaboration with the private sector became increasingly important. Keidanren, Japan’s influential business federation, submitted policy proposals in both 2010 and 2011 that reflected this dual focus:

Advocating for the expansion of private space activities, emphasizing economic growth and technological innovation.

Stressing the government’s responsibility to prevent environmental degradation of orbital space, particularly the accumulation of debris that could endanger future operations.

The government largely accepted the premise that encouraging private participation in space required robust regulatory oversight. This included the recognition that debris mitigation measures were necessary for both operational safety and long-term industry sustainability. These discussions helped shape a regulatory culture in which private actors would eventually be subject to standardized debris control policies while pursuing commercial space endeavors.

2012-2013

This period is best understood as “regulation without legislation.”

During 2012–2013, Japan’s approach to space debris management relied heavily on administrative guidance and technical standards rather than formal statutory law. In effect, the Japanese space sector operated under a framework where compliance was expected, but not legally mandated. This approach allowed the government to influence operator behavior while formal legal instruments were still under development.

JAXA Standards as De Facto National Rules

A central element of this regulatory environment was the JAXA Space Debris Mitigation Standard (JAXA-JMR-003). This standard functioned as the practical rulebook for mission planning and debris management. Key elements included:

Governance of mission planning, passivation procedures, end-of-life disposal orbits, and general operational conduct.

Application to all government-led missions as well as any private or institutional mission receiving public funding, effectively creating a broad scope of influence.

Administrative enforcement, meaning compliance was monitored and expected, even in the absence of statutory authority, reflecting a reliance on organizational norms rather than law.

Although these standards were not codified in legislation, they effectively shaped operator behavior and established a baseline for responsible debris mitigation in Japan. Compliance was largely incentivized through funding mechanisms and institutional oversight rather than through legal penalties.

Legal Translation Begins (2013)

In 2013, efforts began to formalize these technical norms into a legal framework. Cabinet Office working groups initiated the process of translating JAXA’s operational standards into language suitable for national licensing laws. Discussions focused on how to convert best practices into enforceable requirements while maintaining flexibility for technological and operational realities. Specific debris-related issues examined included:

Determining whether disposal timelines for satellites and orbital assets should become legally enforceable.

Establishing requirements for ex ante collision risk assessment to prevent on-orbit accidents.

Considering how to incorporate UN debris mitigation guidelines without verbatim adoption, balancing international consistency with domestic legal and technical needs.

These discussions reflected an emerging recognition that administrative standards alone were insufficient for long-term sustainability and international credibility.

International Signaling

During this period, Japan also communicated its intentions internationally. Notifications to the United Nations emphasized that:

Future domestic regulation would be aligned with the guidelines developed by the Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC) and the UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS).

Compliance by national operators would be ensured through domestic authorization and licensing mechanisms, signaling Japan’s commitment to responsible space operations while still developing formal legislation.

By the end of this period, Japan had established a regulatory environment where technical standards functioned as de facto law, setting the stage for subsequent statutory codification. This “regulation without legislation” approach allowed Japan to maintain responsible space operations and international credibility while preparing a legal framework for the future.

2014-2015

Space Situational Awareness as Regulatory Capacity (2014)

In 2014, Japan’s engagement in Space Situational Awareness (SSA) through its data-sharing agreement with the United States marked a pivotal shift in the country’s regulatory approach to orbital safety. By gaining access to high-fidelity SSA information, Japanese authorities could move beyond passive oversight and actively enforce collision-avoidance and debris mitigation requirements.

The agreement had several direct regulatory implications:

It enabled government authorities to verify and review operator claims regarding collision-avoidance maneuvers, ensuring that reported actions were consistent with observed SSA data.

The availability of precise tracking information effectively eliminated “lack of data” as a defensible rationale for insufficient debris mitigation practices. Operators could no longer cite gaps in situational awareness to justify non-compliance.

SSA became a foundational prerequisite for establishing enforceable collision-avoidance obligations. Without access to accurate tracking data, the government could not credibly hold operators accountable, but with SSA, regulatory authority gained both clarity and credibility.

By linking SSA capabilities directly to regulatory enforcement, Japan strengthened its capacity to oversee orbital activities while signaling to both domestic and international stakeholders that compliance would be verifiable and mandatory.

Licensing Philosophy Finalized (2015)

Building on SSA capabilities, Japan formalized its licensing philosophy for space operations in 2015. Regulatory authorities adopted a flexible, adaptive approach to orbital debris mitigation, prioritizing enforceability and ongoing relevance over rigid technical prescriptions. Key aspects of this philosophy included:

Debris mitigation requirements were codified as a mandatory condition of licensing, making compliance a formal legal obligation rather than a voluntary guideline.

Evaluation of mitigation measures would occur on a case-by-case basis, allowing regulators to account for mission-specific considerations and operational constraints.

The legal framework intentionally avoided fixed technical thresholds, such as specific altitude limits or debris reduction percentages, which risked becoming obsolete as technology and orbital conditions evolved.

Instead, regulators relied on review standards that could be updated administratively without requiring full parliamentary amendment. This approach ensured that the rules could adapt to new information, evolving debris threats, and technological innovation.

2016-2017

2016 – Space Activities Act Enacted

In 2016, the government enacted the Space Activities Act, a landmark piece of legislation establishing the legal framework for space operations and emphasizing the mitigation of space debris. The Act marked a significant step in translating international best practices into enforceable domestic law, ensuring that all licensed space activities adhered to responsible standards for orbital safety.

Key provisions of the Act included:

Legal enforcement of debris mitigation: The Act made compliance with debris mitigation measures a mandatory legal requirement, moving beyond voluntary guidelines and giving the government clear authority to hold operators accountable.

Licensing requirements for applicants: Entities seeking approval to conduct space activities were required to submit comprehensive plans that included:
- Measures designed to prevent the creation of debris during all phases of a mission.
- Detailed end-of-life disposal strategies, specifying how satellites or other spacecraft would be deorbited, moved to graveyard orbits, or otherwise removed from operational pathways.
- Operational safety measures addressing collision avoidance, in-orbit monitoring, and risk management throughout the mission lifecycle.

Government oversight and enforcement powers: The Act granted authorities the ability to ensure compliance through:
- Denial of licenses for applicants failing to meet debris mitigation or safety standards.
- Imposition of specific operational conditions or limitations on approved missions.
- Revocation of authorization for license holders who violated the Act or failed to implement required mitigation measures.

Overall, the 2016 Act provided a structured, legally binding approach to responsible space operations, explicitly linking domestic licensing to global debris mitigation norms.

2017 – Regulatory Detailing

Following the enactment of the Space Activities Act, the government moved to clarify and operationalize the law in 2017 by issuing detailed regulations and guidance for space operators. These regulations provided the practical framework for evaluating and enforcing compliance.

Key regulatory actions in 2017 included:

Licensing review standards: Clear criteria were established for evaluating license applications, emphasizing technical feasibility, operational safety, and environmental responsibility.

Evaluation procedures: Structured procedures were implemented to ensure consistent, transparent assessment of proposed missions, including formal review cycles and interagency coordination.

Administrative guidance documents: Operators were provided with guidance detailing expectations for mission planning, risk management, and adherence to debris mitigation practices.

Importantly, the regulations explicitly incorporated international and technical standards, including:

UN Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines: Domestic requirements mirrored globally recognized practices for minimizing orbital debris, ensuring alignment with multilateral space law principles.

JAXA technical standards: The government referenced Japan’s Aerospace Exploration Agency technical protocols, providing concrete engineering benchmarks for safe spacecraft operation, end-of-life disposal, and collision avoidance.

Debris mitigation assessments under the 2017 regulations were not considered in isolation but were integrated into a broader risk evaluation framework that accounted for:

Liability exposure: Evaluations considered potential legal and financial responsibility in the event of collisions or uncontrolled debris generation.

National security concerns: Licensing decisions weighed the impact of missions on national defense interests and sensitive orbital assets.

International obligations: Compliance with treaties, international norms, and collaborative agreements was a critical factor in license approval, ensuring that domestic operations did not compromise the country’s standing in the global space community.

By the end of 2017, the combination of the Space Activities Act and the supporting regulatory framework created a comprehensive, enforceable system for space operations, placing debris mitigation at the center of mission planning and licensing considerations.

2018-2019

2018 – Law Comes into Force

In November 2018, Japan implemented a new regulatory framework governing space launches, marking a significant shift in national space policy. Under this law, all new launches conducted by Japanese operators were required to obtain official licensing before proceeding. This change signaled a transition from voluntary adherence to debris mitigation guidelines toward a legally enforceable standard.

Key aspects of the law included:

Mandatory Debris Mitigation: Space debris mitigation measures were no longer optional or aspirational. Operators were legally required to demonstrate that they had concrete strategies in place to minimize the creation of new debris during their missions.

Proof of Disposal Feasibility: Operators had to provide evidence that any post-mission disposal, such as deorbiting or moving a satellite to a graveyard orbit, was feasible and technically sound.

Risk Minimization: The law emphasized minimizing the risk posed to other operational satellites and the broader space environment, requiring risk assessments and mitigation planning.

Operational Responsibility: Licensees were held accountable for ensuring that their missions complied with these standards throughout the mission lifecycle, including operational phases and post-mission disposal.

This regulatory approach made it clear that Japan viewed space debris as a serious operational and legal concern, aligning national policy with international best practices on sustainable space operations.

2019 – Normalization of Debris Review

By 2019, the process of integrating debris mitigation into licensing had become routine within Japan’s space administration. Licensing reviews for new launches no longer treated debris mitigation as a special or exceptional requirement. Instead, it was fully embedded as a standard compliance component.

Key developments during this period included:

Routine Compliance Checks: Licensing authorities systematically evaluated each mission for adherence to debris mitigation requirements, ensuring that operators were consistently following best practices.

Explicit Conditions: Approved missions began receiving licenses with clear, specific conditions related to debris management, leaving little ambiguity about the expectations for risk reduction and disposal planning.

Ongoing Reporting Obligations: Operators were required to submit regular reports on debris-related activities, such as post-launch monitoring, disposal operations, and any unexpected events, reinforcing operational accountability.

2020-2021

During 2020–2021, no major statutory changes were enacted in U.S. space policy, but regulatory oversight of orbital activities became more rigorous, with administrative enforcement practices increasingly focused on minimizing long-term debris risk. Debris mitigation plans submitted by operators were scrutinized along multiple dimensions:

Credibility: Authorities evaluated whether proposed mitigation measures were realistic, technically feasible, and supported by verifiable data. Plans lacking detailed operational procedures or relying on untested technologies faced higher scrutiny.

Operator Capacity: Regulators assessed whether companies had the financial, technical, and organizational resources to implement mitigation measures effectively. This included reviewing engineering expertise, prior experience, and risk management practices.

Long-term Orbital Impact: Plans were evaluated not only for immediate compliance but also for their potential to prevent long-term orbital congestion and cascading collisions, reflecting growing attention to space sustainability.

Government oversight expanded beyond launch licensing to include post-launch operations, monitoring the execution of mitigation plans, tracking orbital debris contributions, and ensuring compliance with international obligations. Agencies increasingly used data from space tracking networks and satellite operators to verify adherence to approved debris management strategies.

Private Sector Regulation

Private sector activities, particularly in debris removal and satellite servicing, continued to be regulated under existing licensing frameworks, though enforcement became more granular and outcomes-driven. Key regulatory focuses included:

Companies developing debris removal or servicing technologies were required to demonstrate that their operations would not create additional debris or increase collision risks.

Regulatory evaluations emphasized operational safety, including the reliability of capture mechanisms, de-orbit strategies, and contingency plans for system failures.

Compliance also involved reporting obligations to government agencies, allowing regulators to track real-time operations and enforce accountability.

2022-2023

In 2022–2023, Japan issued new guidance emphasizing proactive management of satellite collision risks, signaling a shift from reactive disposal measures to comprehensive collision prevention strategies. Operators were required to implement structured internal protocols to ensure rapid and consistent decision-making in potential collision scenarios. Specifically, the guidance mandated that operators:

Establish clear internal decision-making structures to evaluate and respond to potential satellite collisions, ensuring accountability and efficiency.

Define authority for maneuver decisions, specifying which roles or individuals are empowered to authorize collision avoidance actions.

Maintain stringent conjunction response timelines, ensuring that potential risks are addressed promptly and minimizing the window for operational errors.

This guidance marked a significant change in responsibility allocation. Collision avoidance was elevated from a purely technical function, traditionally handled by engineering or mission control teams, to a broader management responsibility. Organizations were expected to integrate risk assessment, operational planning, and response protocols at the executive level, embedding collision prevention into the core governance of satellite operations.

Inter-Ministerial Expansion

In parallel, Japan expanded the scope of oversight through inter-ministerial collaboration. The Ministry of the Environment became increasingly involved in satellite policy, reflecting the growing recognition of long-term orbital sustainability as an environmental issue. Key areas of focus included:

Legacy satellite disposal policy, ensuring that defunct or inactive satellites are safely removed from operational orbits in accordance with updated standards.

Long-term orbital environmental planning, with an emphasis on minimizing congestion and reducing the cumulative risk of collisions in heavily trafficked orbital regions.

By involving the Ministry of the Environment, Japan positioned orbital debris management not only as a technical or industrial concern but as part of broader environmental governance. This integration underscored the importance of aligning operational practices with sustainability objectives and long-term stewardship of space.

2024-2025

In 2024, the Cabinet Office took a significant step to enhance compliance across Japan’s space sector by releasing a comprehensive debris mitigation guidebook. The guide specifically targeted key groups within the industry, including universities, startups, and first-time space operators. These entities often lacked extensive experience with space regulations, making them more susceptible to accidental non-compliance. By providing clear, actionable guidance, the guidebook not only reduced the risk of regulatory breaches but also ensured that these newer participants could engage in space activities safely and responsibly.

The initiative had several notable effects:

It broadened the regulatory reach of Japan’s space governance framework, ensuring that even emerging operators were aware of their responsibilities.

It standardized best practices for debris mitigation, helping to prevent unintentional creation of orbital debris.

It reinforced a culture of compliance and safety across both academic and commercial sectors, laying the groundwork for long-term sustainable space operations.

Overall, the guidebook reflected a proactive approach to managing Japan’s growing involvement in space and demonstrated the government’s recognition that effective debris management required engagement with all levels of the space community.

2025

Building on the compliance-focused measures of 2024, Japan shifted its focus in 2025 toward establishing broader international norms for space debris management. The government proposed a set of rules for active debris removal, signaling a commitment to global leadership in responsible space operations. By framing debris as a shared challenge rather than a purely national concern, Japan emphasized the importance of collective action and governance.

Key developments included:

Proposed international rules for active debris removal aimed at creating a predictable and safe orbital environment. These rules sought to encourage cooperation among nations and private actors in removing high-risk objects from orbit.

Announced amendments to modernize the Space Activities Act, ensuring that Japan’s domestic legislation aligned with emerging technologies and international best practices. These amendments included updated compliance requirements for debris mitigation and clarified responsibilities for private operators.

Explicit recognition of space debris as a global commons governance issue. Japan’s policy framing highlighted the need for collective stewardship of orbital space, positioning debris management as a responsibility shared by all spacefaring nations.

2026+